The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to produce relevant records concerning the complaint about Congress MP Rahul Gandhi’s alleged British citizenship. This development came after a petition was filed, seeking an FIR against Gandhi for dual nationality. The court’s order highlights ongoing legal battles related to his citizenship status and potential violations of Indian laws.
Allegations and Petition for FIR Against Rahul Gandhi
The petition, filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) worker S Vignesh Shishir from Karnataka, questions Gandhi’s citizenship. Shishir has alleged that Gandhi holds dual citizenship and has been concealing it. He sought the registration of an FIR against Gandhi, invoking several sections of Indian law, including the Official Secrets Act, the Foreigners Act, and the Passport Act.
This petition follows a rejection by the special MP/MLA court in Lucknow on January 28, 2026, where Shishir’s plea for an FIR was dismissed. The court had stated that it was not competent to decide on the issue of citizenship. However, Shishir escalated the matter to the High Court, asking for a detailed investigation.
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court at Lucknow Bench headed by has issued a Very Important and Landmark Interim Order today on 09/03/2026 in the Criminal Case Seeking Registration of FIR against Rahul Gandhi due to his British Citizenship after hearing the Petitioner S Vignesh…
— VIGNESH SHISHIR (@VIGNESHBJP_KTK) March 9, 2026
Shishir has cited several provisions under Indian law, including the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Official Secrets Act, and the Foreigners Act. He seeks the registration of an FIR against Gandhi under multiple sections, including those relating to the violation of nationality laws. The petition also questions Gandhi’s actions related to the official documents and his role in India’s politics, alleging that he violated provisions meant to prevent dual citizenship.
Court Orders Union Government to Respond
During the hearing on Monday, the Lucknow bench, led by Justice Rajeev Singh, raised questions about the steps the Union government has taken in response to the complaint. The bench directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to present the entire case file before the court. This order underscores the court’s efforts to gather detailed information about the situation and hold those involved accountable.
Transfer of the Case to Lucknow Bench
Originally, the criminal complaint was filed in Rae Bareli. However, on December 17, 2025, the Allahabad High Court transferred the case to the Lucknow bench. The petition filed by Shishir challenged the rejection of his plea to register an FIR. The court’s decision to transfer the case reflects the importance of the issue at hand and the need for a thorough investigation.
This case has sparked significant political debate, with the opposition questioning the timing and motives behind the accusations against Gandhi. The issue has become a topic of interest across social media platforms, with public opinions divided. While some support the legal action, others view it as a political move aimed at tarnishing Gandhi’s reputation.
The case also raises questions about the process of citizenship verification and how such cases should be handled. Legal experts argue that dual citizenship can lead to significant legal challenges, especially for public officeholders.
A Growing Legal Battle
The case continues to unfold, and both the legal and political stakes are rising. The Allahabad High Court’s decision to involve the Centre ensures the matter gets the attention it deserves. With the next hearing scheduled for March 19, 2026, all eyes are on the case’s progress and potential legal actions against Gandhi.
This case about Rahul Gandhi’s alleged British citizenship raises significant legal and political challenges. As the Allahabad High Court seeks answers, it sparks debate about citizenship, national security, and accountability. The Centre must now provide records, and the coming weeks will be crucial for resolving the issue. This case reminds us of the need for transparency in national matters.
