Supreme Court on 27 May declared the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process valid. CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi led the bench. The court rejected claims labeling the procedure unconstitutional.
Election Commission Authority Upheld
SC emphasized the Election Commission acted within its powers. SIR differs from normal voter list revision but remains legally and constitutionally valid.
Handling of Voter Verification
Court clarified that removing names during SIR was appropriate. Citizens proving residency bore responsibility. Prior SIR lists remain relevant for verification.
Citizenship Determination and Documentation
SC noted that the Commission included individuals based on document credibility. SIR’s goal was not to exclude citizens. Suspected cases can be referred to the central government.
Constitutional and RP Act Compliance
The bench concluded SIR meets constitutional and Representation of the People Act requirements. Election Commission holds authority to determine rules, procedures, and verification.
Background of Petitions
Petitions challenged SIR as exceeding powers under Article 326 and RP Act 1950. They questioned the requirement for voters from 2002–03 lists to prove parentage.
