SIT submitted its preliminary findings after investigating Ram Mandir donation system issues. Additionally, the report documents multiple irregularities in financial handling. Moreover, investigators reviewed donation collection methods including cash and digital systems. Consequently, the case reveals structural and operational inconsistencies.
Multiple donation channels create complex financial structure
Investigators recorded donations through hundi, online transfers, and cash counters. Furthermore, each channel contributed differently to total collections. Additionally, bank records supported analysis of donation inflows. Therefore, the system shows layered financial operations.
Visitor data shows sharp fluctuation during peak periods
Records show around 25 lakh monthly visitors to Ram Mandir. However, Kumbh month recorded nearly one crore visitors. Moreover, investigators linked attendance changes with donation variations. Consequently, visitor spikes influenced financial reporting patterns.
Donation estimates reveal inconsistencies in recorded inflows
SIT calculated per devotee contribution between 15 and 18 rupees. Additionally, offerings like jewellery, grains, and oil remained unaccounted. Moreover, absence of evidence limited full valuation of donations. Therefore, actual totals remain partially unclear.
Bank records show mismatch between visitors and donations
Several months showed higher visitors but lower donations. Furthermore, staff reported higher coin usage during those periods. Additionally, note circulation reportedly declined in comparison. Consequently, financial trends appeared inconsistent.
Staffing irregularities raise administrative concerns
SIT found employees working without written appointment orders. Moreover, such roles operated within donation handling systems. Additionally, lack of formal documentation created accountability gaps. Therefore, staffing practices face scrutiny.
Officials and committee performance under investigation lens
Monitoring committee performance showed negligence in donation oversight. Furthermore, Champat Rai and others faced suspicion in findings. Additionally, appointment irregularities increased concerns. Consequently, leadership accountability questions intensified.
CCTV and financial growth deepen investigation scope
CCTV footage review raised additional operational questions. Moreover, investigators found no clear proof of donation sources. Additionally, employee wealth reportedly increased over five years. Therefore, transparency concerns expanded further.
SIT highlights missing records and incomplete accountability
Investigators confirmed absence of complete donor-level records. Furthermore, donation theft amount remains unverified due to evidence gaps. Additionally, SIT questioned over 60 individuals during probe. Consequently, final report remains under structured review timeline.
