Oendrila Kapoor’s LinkedIn post has sparked a crucial debate on the role of caste in modern matchmaking. The post sheds light on how caste continues to play a significant role in choosing partners, even among educated, urban professionals. What’s interesting is that the preference for caste often shifts when money enters the equation.
View this post on Instagram
Caste Still Matters, But Money Changes the Equation
In her post, Kapoor shared a conversation with a 32-year-old woman who owns a fashion label. Despite her progressive background, the woman had one non-negotiable condition when choosing a life partner: “Upper Caste Matches” unless the man earned ₹80 LPA or more. Kapoor, who works as a matchmaker, found this preference all too familiar. It’s a common situation where potential partners are evaluated based on financial status rather than just caste.
Kapoor asked the woman whether she would reject a man who fulfilled all other criteria except caste. The woman’s response was straightforward: “If he makes 80 lakhs or more, then I’m okay with it.”
Money Trumps Caste in the End
This response led Kapoor to reflect on the role of social rank in matchmaking. “Caste matters unless money compensates for it,” she wrote. This preference is not about compatibility or shared values but about status. When money enters the picture, caste becomes secondary.
Many urban dwellers claim to be progressive but still struggle to let go of caste-based filters in matchmaking. Kapoor pointed out how this contradiction plays out on matrimonial apps. She encourages people to challenge these ingrained biases and have honest conversations with their families about rejecting caste-based preferences.
Challenging the Status Quo
Kapoor’s post forces us to question the deeply embedded biases in our society. We may live in metro cities and call ourselves progressive, but caste still dictates many of our decisions. Kapoor suggests that the real change can begin with a simple step: “The next time you’re about to check caste first on a profile, stop and think. Keep reading instead.”
Reactions from the Online Community
Kapoor’s post struck a chord with many, leading to an outpouring of comments. One user remarked, “Finding true love was the point… somewhere it got replaced by caste and CTC.” Another added, “Indian marriages, especially arranged marriages, are just a transaction. It always has been and probably always will be.” A third commented, “A common story for most people.”
This exchange of views emphasizes that while we strive for progress, deep-rooted biases continue to influence the most personal decisions in our lives.
