Pune police investigation continues revealing new details in Ketan Aggarwal murder case. Additionally, accused Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary disclosed key planning secrets. Moreover, officials confirmed the killing involved long preparation instead of sudden action. Therefore, the case now reflects a structured conspiracy narrative.
Siya Goyal reveals pre-decided signal system used in murder plan
Police sources state Siya and Chetan agreed on a signal method. Furthermore, Siya would bend before pushing moment triggered execution. Additionally, Chetan would then push Ketan into the valley. Consequently, both coordinated timing during Lohagad fort visit.
18 June attack executed after failed earlier attempt on 14 June
Investigation confirms first attempt occurred on 14 June. Moreover, Ketan escaped after holding a tree during push attempt. Additionally, Siya later claimed she pushed him to save from snake. Therefore, second plan activated on 18 June successfully.
Police identify Siya as alleged mastermind behind entire operation
SP Pune Rural Sandip Singh Gill described Siya as key planner. Furthermore, she allegedly recruited Chetan for execution role. Additionally, she selected Lohagad fort as crime location. Consequently, investigators treat her as central conspirator.
Multiple murder strategies planned before final execution attempt
Probe reveals three separate murder plans were prepared. Moreover, planning started on 31 May during first fort visit. Additionally, a “death point” was marked near valley area. Therefore, backup strategies ensured contingency execution options.
Alternate accident plan prepared in case final attempt failed
Investigators found third backup plan existed for failure scenario. Furthermore, road accident strategy was also prepared. Additionally, multiple fallback options indicate structured criminal design. Consequently, case extends beyond single-event theory.
Siya claims she informed Ketal about relationship with Chetan
During interrogation, Siya stated she disclosed affair details. Moreover, she told Ketan she did not want marriage. Additionally, Ketan reportedly refused to cancel wedding plans. Therefore, personal conflict intensified between both sides.
Family pressure and relationship tensions add new dimension to case
Siya reported family pressure regarding marriage decisions. Furthermore, family preferred Ketan due to financial stability. Additionally, Chetan’s weaker financial status opposed the alliance. Consequently, social pressure influenced relationship conflict.
Police uncover substance use and behavioral background details
Investigation confirms Siya and Chetan admitted alcohol use. Moreover, police linked them to substance dependency patterns. Additionally, Siya left education after class 12. Therefore, background details strengthen investigative profile.
Gatekeeper testimony reveals suspicious activity on murder day
Security staff reported Chetan arrived masked at fort entry. Furthermore, he refused entry fee claiming exercise purpose. Additionally, Siya also argued over ticket payment method. Consequently, behavior raised suspicion among authorities.
Mobile phone evidence strengthens digital trail investigation
Police found Chetan left his phone at a shop. Moreover, he used employee’s mobile device instead. Additionally, location tracking and statements were recorded. Therefore, digital evidence supports investigation findings.
Family members express shock and demand justice for Ketan
Ketan’s family suspected Siya after suspicious behavior at home visit. Furthermore, relatives questioned repeated insistence on Lohagad trips. Additionally, grandfather cited 35-year family relations with Goyals. Consequently, betrayal deeply shocked both families.
Police continue interrogation as deeper conspiracy probe expands
Investigators continue questioning both accused in custody. Moreover, agencies examine full planning structure and involvement network. Additionally, case review continues across multiple evidence layers. Therefore, final conclusions remain under active investigation.
