The Supreme Court expressed strong displeasure in the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) protest case. The issue involved a notice issued to a student by a Greater Noida magistrate. A lawyer informed the court that police requested the notice. However, authorities later withdrew it after concerns emerged over its purpose.
CJI Questions Magistrate’s Authority Over Notice
Chief Justice Suryakant questioned how an executive magistrate could issue such a notice. He said the court would seek an explanation from the magistrate. The CJI asked officials to explain the reason behind issuing the notice. He pointed out that the Supreme Court had already restricted action against students.
Earlier, on September 1, the Supreme Court ordered a pause on further action. The order covered all FIRs registered against students.
Court Calls Notice Against Earlier Order
During the hearing, the lawyer said the notice appeared against the Supreme Court’s direction. He added that the step looked like an attempt to intimidate students.
Although authorities withdrew the notice, the court questioned its issuance. The bench highlighted that its previous order clearly prevented punitive measures.
Chief Justice Suryakant said the situation surprised the court. He asked how a magistrate could issue such a notice after the earlier order.
Supreme Court Seeks Explanation From Magistrate
The CJI stated that the court had clearly directed authorities. No student should face punitive action under the previous order. Therefore, the magistrate must explain the decision behind the notice. The Supreme Court will examine why officials took that step.
The matter has raised questions about following judicial directions during the CJP protest case. The court’s concern focused on protecting students from action despite its earlier instructions.
