Praise With A Warning: AIMIM Leader Targets Yogi’s Inner Circle

Shaukat Ali calls Yogi Adityanath a good man yet blames advisers for misleading decisions while also attacking Om Prakash Rajbhar

AIMIM Uttar Pradesh president Haji Shaukat Ali made a surprising statement during a visit to Ambedkar Nagar. He attended a local party event on Tuesday, April 7. During this program, he praised Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. However, he also raised concerns about those influencing him.

Praise With Criticism

Firstly, Shaukat Ali described Yogi Adityanath as a good person and a saint. However, he claimed that advisers mislead the Chief Minister regularly. Therefore, he suggested that wrong guidance affects decisions taken at the top.

Additionally, he criticised the Chief Minister’s language strongly. He said that such statements appear threatening toward a specific community. Consequently, he called this style of communication condemnable.

Attack on Om Prakash Rajbhar

Meanwhile, Shaukat Ali directly targeted Cabinet Minister Om Prakash Rajbhar. He stated that historical narratives around Salar Masood Ghazi and Suheldev Rajbhar now originate from Rajbhar’s office. Moreover, he claimed that the same version reaches the Chief Minister.

Therefore, he suggested that this narrative shapes the understanding of Yogi Adityanath. As a result, he questioned the influence of political figures on historical interpretation.

Remarks on Rajbhar’s Rise

Furthermore, Shaukat Ali referred to Om Prakash Rajbhar as his elder brother. He highlighted that India’s Constitution allows social mobility and opportunity. Consequently, he mentioned that Rajbhar rose from driving a tempo to becoming a Cabinet Minister.

However, he also raised allegations regarding preferential treatment. He claimed that Rajbhar and his children receive VIP privileges. Additionally, he stated that they face no consequences despite serious issues.

Political Message Behind Statement

Overall, Shaukat Ali’s remarks combined appreciation with sharp criticism. Moreover, he highlighted concerns about advisory influence and political favoritism. Therefore, his statement added another layer to ongoing political debates in Uttar Pradesh.