Tulsi Gabbard has made new claims regarding the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic. She stated that US-funded research links existed with a Wuhan laboratory in China. Additionally, she alleged that former US health adviser Anthony Fauci funded that lab.
Moreover, she said Fauci later influenced intelligence assessments on the pandemic origin. She also claimed he later denied such connections under oath before Congress.
Declassified Documents and Intelligence Review Process
Furthermore, Gabbard released multiple documents related to US-funded biolabs. These records reportedly came from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. They form part of a broader transparency review under Donald Trump’s directive.
Additionally, the review examined pandemic origin assessments and agency roles. It also collected testimonies from officials alleging retaliation over lab-leak discussions.
Claims of Influence and Intelligence Manipulation
Gabbard stated Fauci interacted closely with intelligence officials during Covid discussions. She alleged he suggested experts and influenced scientific assessments presented publicly. These assessments later appeared as consensus scientific views, according to the documents.
Moreover, internal communications described Fauci as a subject matter expert. Officials reportedly relied on his recommendations during the 90-day Biden review process.
Biden Administration Review and Internal Discussions
In addition, the Biden administration conducted a 90-day Covid origin review. Documents show discussions about consulting scientists recommended by Fauci. Officials considered his input critical due to his research knowledge.
Conflicting Intelligence Views on Covid Origin
However, intelligence agencies remained divided on Covid origin theories. Some supported natural transmission from animals. Others considered lab-related incidents more likely scenarios.
Meanwhile, a 2020 laboratory assessment noted possible accidental release conditions in Wuhan. It gave equal weight to lab-leak and natural origin hypotheses.
Allegations of Retaliation and Ongoing Investigations
Additionally, whistleblower claims suggest analysts faced consequences over lab-leak support. Some reportedly faced sidelining or restrictions in expressing alternative views. These claims were forwarded for further review by inspectors general.
Gabbard’s Strong Remarks on Accountability
Gabbard said millions suffered during the Covid-19 pandemic worldwide. She also demanded transparency after years of alleged misinformation and censorship. Furthermore, she accused officials of manipulating intelligence and restricting information access.
