Discussion around possible UPI charges has intensified during recent days. Meanwhile, the government has also addressed public confusion surrounding this issue. Parliament later discussed the matter, where Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman appeared visibly angry. During that exchange, she even described Indian communists as cowards.
On Monday, Sitharaman targeted CPI(M) MP John Brittas during Parliament’s Monsoon Session. The discussion concerned possible charges on UPI payments. At that time, lawmakers debated the Taxation and Other Laws Amendment Bill, 2026. During his remarks, Brittas accused the government of preparing UPI fees under American pressure.
Brittas argued that such a move would contradict Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s earlier statement. Modi had described digital payments as a free public good for citizens. Furthermore, Brittas claimed Brazil had faced similar pressure. According to him, this approach differed from the policy followed between 2017 and 2025. During those years, merchants and customers did not pay digital transaction charges.
Why Nirmala Sitharaman Became Angry
Brittas presented his arguments and raised questions during the debate. However, he left Parliament before Sitharaman began answering those points. Consequently, the Finance Minister strongly criticised his absence.
Sitharaman accused opposition members of distorting facts during parliamentary discussions. She argued that they often leave when ministers respond to those claims. Moreover, she accused Brittas of creating confusion across India regarding possible UPI charges.
The Finance Minister also explained her approach towards parliamentary debate. She said she listens to every MP during discussions. Furthermore, Sitharaman stated that she tries answering questions raised by members.
Finance Minister Questions Responsibility During Parliamentary Debate
Sitharaman argued that every MP has the right to speak inside Parliament. However, she said lawmakers also carry responsibility while exercising that privilege. According to her, members should remain present when the government answers their questions.
Therefore, the dispute moved beyond possible UPI fees themselves. The exchange also centred on parliamentary responsibility and participation during debates. Sitharaman’s anger primarily followed Brittas leaving before she could respond to his allegations.
